<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Rails Blog comments on LeadsOnRails Reviews</title>
    <link>http://railsweek.com/blog/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Rails Blog comments</description>
    <item>
      <title>"LeadsOnRails Reviews" by smeade</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Reviews for our small business lead management product, LeadsOnRails.com, are starting to come in.  A new one today is not about the product, but rather about the product&amp;#8217;s website.  Bob Walsh, the man who wrote &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;#38;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FMicro-ISV-Vision-Reality-Bob-Walsh%2Fdp%2F1590596013%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1174971824%26sr%3D8-1&amp;#38;tag=smalbusisalea-20&amp;#38;linkCode=ur2&amp;#38;camp=1789&amp;#38;creative=9325"&gt;the book&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=smalbusisalea-20&amp;amp;l=ur2&amp;amp;o=1" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /&gt; on micro-ISVs and &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;#38;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FClear-Blogging-People-Changing-World%2Fdp%2F1590596919%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1174971875%26sr%3D1-1&amp;#38;tag=smalbusisalea-20&amp;#38;linkCode=ur2&amp;#38;camp=1789&amp;#38;creative=9325"&gt;blogging&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=smalbusisalea-20&amp;amp;l=ur2&amp;amp;o=1" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /&gt;, and the author of this &lt;a href="http://www.mymicroisv.com/?p=284"&gt;review&lt;/a&gt;, of the LeadsOnRails product site, made an important point that I want to make sure us Rails programmers get.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Bob says: 
&lt;em&gt;LeadsOnRails could have derailed (sorry) at this point by doing a laundry list of features, leading with the ultra sexy (to programmers), ultra cool (to programmers), fact it’s in Ruby on Rails; that it’s not a Web 1.0 app, but a Web 2.0 app (only programmers understand this), that it’s driven with clean URLs (I barely understand this), etc., etc., etc.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;They did no such thing. They understand that while these features appeal to programmers, benefits – especially benefits couched in terms of what small business owners care about – was the way to go.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;If we want to see Rails&amp;#8217; adoption rate grow, we need to be explaining why it and development methods associated with it (agile, rapid, test-driven, etc.) are good for business.  Not just why it&amp;#8217;s kewl.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:56:00 EDT</pubDate>
      <guid>&lt;a href="/blog/articles/2007/03/27/leadsonrails-reviews"&gt;LeadsOnRails Reviews&lt;/a&gt;</guid>
      <link>&lt;a href="/blog/articles/2007/03/27/leadsonrails-reviews"&gt;LeadsOnRails Reviews&lt;/a&gt;</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
